U.S. Apologizes for Syphilis Program in Guatemala
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:09 pm
U.S. Apologizes for Syphilis Program in Guatemala
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.
Published: October 1, 2010
From 1946 to 1948, American public health doctors deliberately infected nearly 700 Guatemalans — prison
inmates, mental patients and soldiers — with venereal diseases in what was meant as an effort to test the
effectiveness of penicillin.
American tax dollars, through the National Institutes of Health, even paid for syphilis-infected prostitutes to
sleep with prisoners, since Guatemalan prisons allowed such visits. When the prostitutes did not succeed in
infecting the men, some prisoners had the bacteria poured onto scrapes made on their penises, faces or
arms, and in some cases it was injected by spinal puncture.
If the subjects contracted the disease, they were given antibiotics.
“However, whether everyone was then cured is not clear,” said Susan M. Reverby, the professor at Wellesley
College who brought the experiments to light in a research paper that prompted American health officials to
investigate.
The revelations were made public on Friday, when Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Health and
Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius apologized to the government of Guatemala and the survivors
and descendants of those infected. They called the experiments “clearly unethical.”
“Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research
could have occurred under the guise of public health,” the secretaries said in a statement. “We deeply regret
that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were affected by such abhorrent research
practices.”
In a twist to the revelation, the public health doctor who led the experiment, John C. Cutler, would later have an
important role in the Tuskegee study in which black American men with syphilis were deliberately left untreated
for decades. Late in his own life, Dr. Cutler continued to defend the Tuskegee work.
His unpublished Guatemala work was unearthed recently in the archives of the University of Pittsburgh by
Professor Reverby, a medical historian who has written two books about Tuskegee.
President Álvaro Colom of Guatemala, who first learned of the experiments on Thursday in a phone call from
Mrs. Clinton, called them “hair-raising” and “crimes against humanity.” His government said it would cooperate
with the American investigation and do its own.
The experiments are “a dark chapter in the history of medicine,” said Dr. Francis S. Collins, director of the
National Institutes of Health. Modern rules for federally financed research “absolutely prohibit” infecting people
without their informed consent, Dr. Collins said.
Professor Reverby presented her findings about the Guatemalan experiments at a conference in January, but
nobody took notice, she said in a telephone interview Friday. In June, she sent a draft of an article she was
preparing for the January 2011 issue of the Journal of Policy History to Dr. David J. Sencer, a former director
of the Centers for Disease Control. He prodded the government to investigate.
In the 1940s, Professor Reverby said, the United States Public Health Service “was deeply interested in
whether penicillin could be used to prevent, not just cure, early syphilis infection, whether better blood tests for
the disease could be established, what dosages of penicillin actually cured infection, and to understand the
process of re-infection after cures.”
It had difficulties growing syphilis in the laboratory, and its tests on rabbits and chimpanzees told it little about
how penicillin worked in humans.
In 1944, it injected prison “volunteers” at the Terre Haute Federal Penitentiary in Indiana with lab-grown
gonorrhea, but found it hard to infect people that way.
In 1946, Dr. Cutler was asked to lead the Guatemala mission, which ended two years later, partly because of
medical “gossip” about the work, Professor Reverby said, and partly because he was using so much penicillin,
which was costly and in short supply.
Dr. Cutler would later join the study in Tuskegee, Ala., which had begun relatively innocuously in 1932 as an
observation of how syphilis progressed in black male sharecroppers. In 1972, it was revealed that, even when
early antibiotics were invented, doctors hid that fact from the men in order to keep studying them. Dr. Cutler,
who died in 2003, defended the Tuskegee experiment in a 1993 documentary.
Deception was also used in Guatemala, Professor Reverby said. Dr. Thomas Parran, the former surgeon
general who oversaw the start of Tuskegee, acknowledged that the Guatemala work could not be done
domestically, and details were hidden from Guatemalan officials.
Professor Reverby said she found some of Dr. Cutler’s papers at the University of Pittsburgh, where he taught
until 1985, while she was researching Dr. Parran.
“I’m sifting through them, and I find ‘Guatemala ... inoculation ...’ and I think ‘What the heck is this?’ And then it
was ‘Oh my god, oh my god, oh my god.’ My partner was with me, and I told him, ‘You aren’t going to believe
this.’ ”
Fernando de la Cerda, minister counselor at the Guatemalan Embassy in Washington, said that Mrs. Clinton
apologized to President Colom in her Thursday phone call. “We thank the United States for its transparency in
telling us the facts,” he said.
Asked about the possibility of reparations for survivors or descendants, Mr. de la Cerda said that was still
unclear.
The public response on the Web sites of Guatemalan news outlets was furious. One commenter, Cesar Duran,
on the site of Prensa Libre wrote: “APOLOGIES ... please ... this is what has come to light, but what is still
hidden? They should pay an indemnity to the state of Guatemala, not just apologize.”
Dr. Mark Siegler, director of the Maclean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago’s
medical school, said he was stunned. “This is shocking,” Dr. Siegler said. “This is much worse than Tuskegee
— at least those men were infected by natural means.”
He added: “It’s ironic — no, it’s worse than that, it’s appalling — that, at the same time as the United States
was prosecuting Nazi doctors for crimes against humanity, the U.S. government was supporting research that
placed human subjects at enormous risk.”
The Nuremberg trials of Nazi doctors who experimented on concentration camp inmates and prisoners led to a
code of ethics, though it had no force of law. In the 1964 Helsinki Declaration, the medical associations of
many countries adopted a code.
The Tuskegee scandal and the hearings into it conducted by Senator Edward M. Kennedy became the basis
for the 1981 American laws governing research on human subjects, Dr. Siegler said.
It was preceded by other domestic scandals. From 1963 to 1966, researchers at the Willowbrook State
School on Staten Island infected retarded children with hepatitis to test gamma globulin against it. And in
1963, elderly patients at the Brooklyn Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital were injected with live cancer cells to
see if they caused tumors.
Elisabeth Malkin contributed reporting from Mexico City.
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.
Published: October 1, 2010
From 1946 to 1948, American public health doctors deliberately infected nearly 700 Guatemalans — prison
inmates, mental patients and soldiers — with venereal diseases in what was meant as an effort to test the
effectiveness of penicillin.
American tax dollars, through the National Institutes of Health, even paid for syphilis-infected prostitutes to
sleep with prisoners, since Guatemalan prisons allowed such visits. When the prostitutes did not succeed in
infecting the men, some prisoners had the bacteria poured onto scrapes made on their penises, faces or
arms, and in some cases it was injected by spinal puncture.
If the subjects contracted the disease, they were given antibiotics.
“However, whether everyone was then cured is not clear,” said Susan M. Reverby, the professor at Wellesley
College who brought the experiments to light in a research paper that prompted American health officials to
investigate.
The revelations were made public on Friday, when Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Health and
Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius apologized to the government of Guatemala and the survivors
and descendants of those infected. They called the experiments “clearly unethical.”
“Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research
could have occurred under the guise of public health,” the secretaries said in a statement. “We deeply regret
that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were affected by such abhorrent research
practices.”
In a twist to the revelation, the public health doctor who led the experiment, John C. Cutler, would later have an
important role in the Tuskegee study in which black American men with syphilis were deliberately left untreated
for decades. Late in his own life, Dr. Cutler continued to defend the Tuskegee work.
His unpublished Guatemala work was unearthed recently in the archives of the University of Pittsburgh by
Professor Reverby, a medical historian who has written two books about Tuskegee.
President Álvaro Colom of Guatemala, who first learned of the experiments on Thursday in a phone call from
Mrs. Clinton, called them “hair-raising” and “crimes against humanity.” His government said it would cooperate
with the American investigation and do its own.
The experiments are “a dark chapter in the history of medicine,” said Dr. Francis S. Collins, director of the
National Institutes of Health. Modern rules for federally financed research “absolutely prohibit” infecting people
without their informed consent, Dr. Collins said.
Professor Reverby presented her findings about the Guatemalan experiments at a conference in January, but
nobody took notice, she said in a telephone interview Friday. In June, she sent a draft of an article she was
preparing for the January 2011 issue of the Journal of Policy History to Dr. David J. Sencer, a former director
of the Centers for Disease Control. He prodded the government to investigate.
In the 1940s, Professor Reverby said, the United States Public Health Service “was deeply interested in
whether penicillin could be used to prevent, not just cure, early syphilis infection, whether better blood tests for
the disease could be established, what dosages of penicillin actually cured infection, and to understand the
process of re-infection after cures.”
It had difficulties growing syphilis in the laboratory, and its tests on rabbits and chimpanzees told it little about
how penicillin worked in humans.
In 1944, it injected prison “volunteers” at the Terre Haute Federal Penitentiary in Indiana with lab-grown
gonorrhea, but found it hard to infect people that way.
In 1946, Dr. Cutler was asked to lead the Guatemala mission, which ended two years later, partly because of
medical “gossip” about the work, Professor Reverby said, and partly because he was using so much penicillin,
which was costly and in short supply.
Dr. Cutler would later join the study in Tuskegee, Ala., which had begun relatively innocuously in 1932 as an
observation of how syphilis progressed in black male sharecroppers. In 1972, it was revealed that, even when
early antibiotics were invented, doctors hid that fact from the men in order to keep studying them. Dr. Cutler,
who died in 2003, defended the Tuskegee experiment in a 1993 documentary.
Deception was also used in Guatemala, Professor Reverby said. Dr. Thomas Parran, the former surgeon
general who oversaw the start of Tuskegee, acknowledged that the Guatemala work could not be done
domestically, and details were hidden from Guatemalan officials.
Professor Reverby said she found some of Dr. Cutler’s papers at the University of Pittsburgh, where he taught
until 1985, while she was researching Dr. Parran.
“I’m sifting through them, and I find ‘Guatemala ... inoculation ...’ and I think ‘What the heck is this?’ And then it
was ‘Oh my god, oh my god, oh my god.’ My partner was with me, and I told him, ‘You aren’t going to believe
this.’ ”
Fernando de la Cerda, minister counselor at the Guatemalan Embassy in Washington, said that Mrs. Clinton
apologized to President Colom in her Thursday phone call. “We thank the United States for its transparency in
telling us the facts,” he said.
Asked about the possibility of reparations for survivors or descendants, Mr. de la Cerda said that was still
unclear.
The public response on the Web sites of Guatemalan news outlets was furious. One commenter, Cesar Duran,
on the site of Prensa Libre wrote: “APOLOGIES ... please ... this is what has come to light, but what is still
hidden? They should pay an indemnity to the state of Guatemala, not just apologize.”
Dr. Mark Siegler, director of the Maclean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago’s
medical school, said he was stunned. “This is shocking,” Dr. Siegler said. “This is much worse than Tuskegee
— at least those men were infected by natural means.”
He added: “It’s ironic — no, it’s worse than that, it’s appalling — that, at the same time as the United States
was prosecuting Nazi doctors for crimes against humanity, the U.S. government was supporting research that
placed human subjects at enormous risk.”
The Nuremberg trials of Nazi doctors who experimented on concentration camp inmates and prisoners led to a
code of ethics, though it had no force of law. In the 1964 Helsinki Declaration, the medical associations of
many countries adopted a code.
The Tuskegee scandal and the hearings into it conducted by Senator Edward M. Kennedy became the basis
for the 1981 American laws governing research on human subjects, Dr. Siegler said.
It was preceded by other domestic scandals. From 1963 to 1966, researchers at the Willowbrook State
School on Staten Island infected retarded children with hepatitis to test gamma globulin against it. And in
1963, elderly patients at the Brooklyn Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital were injected with live cancer cells to
see if they caused tumors.
Elisabeth Malkin contributed reporting from Mexico City.